In the face of intensified immigration enforcement across California and the nation, something remarkable is happening in our federal courts. Immigrants and their advocates are fighting back and winning.
Since the escalation of immigration enforcement beginning in early 2025, we have witnessed a surge in ICE operations targeting courthouses, homes, workplaces, and even schools . On some days, more than 200 people have been arrested in Southern California alone, overwhelming detention centers and funneling vulnerable individuals into overcrowded facilities . These tactics are designed to destabilize entire communities and intimidate immigrants into silence.
But here is the truth they don’t want you to know: Detention by ICE is not the end of the road. It is the beginning of a legal battle and you have powerful weapons at your disposal.
The writ of habeas corpus—our centuries-old protection against unlawful government detention—is alive and well in California’s federal courts. In just the past several months, we have seen extraordinary victories that demonstrate the power of legal resistance. This post will share those victories, explain your rights, and provide concrete steps for fighting unlawful ICE detention.
Before diving into recent victories, let’s understand the tool being used to win them.
A petition for writ of habeas corpus (28 U.S.C. § 2241) is a legal filing that challenges the legality of a person’s detention. Unlike regular immigration proceedings, a habeas petition goes directly to federal district court and argues that your detention violates the Constitution or federal law .
For immigrants, habeas is essential because:
The Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause provides that “[n]o person shall be… deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” And it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles noncitizens to due process of law in deportation proceedings.
Court: Central District of California
Date of Order: February 18, 2026
The Facts: Client had been detained by ICE under circumstances warranting a bond hearing. On February 4, 2026, we obtained a Temporary Restraining Order requiring that ICE provide our client with an individualized bond hearing within seven days.
The Government’s Response: Nothing. ICE provided a bond hearing but the AUSA failed to inform the judge. The seven-day period lapsed, and our client remained in detention. When the judge checked the DHS Detainee Locator portal, she confirmed our client was still locked up in blatant violation of her order.
The Victory: On February 18, 2026, the judge issued a no-nonsense order:
“As such, the Court ORDERS Petitioner be released forthwith, but no later than February 18, 2026 at 5 P.M. Respondents are to provide the Court with confirmation of Petitioner’s release by February 18, 2026 at 11:59 P.M.”
The Message: When ICE ignores court orders, federal judges will not look the other way. Our client is now free.
Court: Eastern District of California
Date of Order: February 11, 2026
The Facts: Client entered the United States and was released pending her immigration proceedings. She complied with all check-ins and had no criminal record. Then, without notice or hearing, ICE re-detained her.
The Government’s Response: The government filed a two-page opposition that said, in its entirety: “We submit on our previous filing.” That’s it. No new facts. No new law. No new excuses.
We argued: “At this point, they’re basically sending the Court a strongly worded shrug.”
The Victory: The judge granted the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, holding:
The court didn’t just order release—it enjoined ICE from re-arresting our client absent:
The Impact: This is landmark language establishing powerful protections for anyone who has been released and later re-detained.
Court: Eastern District of California
Date of Order: February 17, 2026
The Facts: Our client entered the U.S., was detained briefly, and was released on parole. Months later, he attended a scheduled ICE check-in—and was re-detained without notice or hearing.
The Government’s Response: The government conceded the case was factually similar to prior cases where this judge had already ruled that due process requires a pre-detention hearing.
The Victory: The judge granted our motion, converted it to a preliminary injunction, and ordered:
“Respondents are ORDERED to immediately release petitioner… respondents are ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining petitioner for any purpose, absent exigent circumstances, without providing petitioner notice and a pre-detention hearing before an immigration judge.”
Notably, the judge also rejected a contrary Fifth Circuit decision, finding its reasoning “unpersuasive.”
The Message: California federal courts are standing firm on due process protections.
Taken together, these three victories establish powerful precedent:
When the government releases someone, it creates an implicit promise that liberty will not be revoked without cause.
You cannot simply detain someone when they show up for a check-in. Due process requires notice and a hearing beforehand.
To re-detain someone, ICE must demonstrate either changed circumstances or clear evidence of danger or flight risk.
When ICE ignores court orders, judges will order immediate release.
Pending appeals in other cases do not justify delaying justice for individuals whose constitutional rights are being violated daily.
If you or someone you know is detained by ICE, here are concrete steps you can take.
California has robust rapid response networks that provide real-time assistance when someone is detained. If the detention occurred within the last 24 hours, contact your local hotline immediately .
For Ventura County: Call the 805 Immigrant Rapid Response Hotline at 805-870-8855 or text “ALERTA” to receive real-time updates . You can also contact VC Defensa at 805-296-1119 to learn of possible ICE activity in your area .
For Los Angeles and Southern California: The Immigrant Defenders Law Network (ImmDef) operates a bilingual public hotline designed to give community members immediate access to legal support when someone is detained . Between June 2025 and January 2026, ImmDef coordinated resources and services for nearly 2,400 community members .
People in removal proceedings are not guaranteed a government-appointed attorney—regardless of age, trauma, or the stakes involved . This means you must find your own lawyer.
ImmDef’s Rapid Response Program provides free, immediate legal support including:
To find free or low-cost immigration legal services in your area, visit the Immigration Legal Services directory or contact your county’s resource line .
If you are detained or have a family member who is detained, documentation is critical. The Community Needs Assessment survey (available through 211 services) helps community organizations understand what resources are most needed by those impacted by ICE activity . Collected information is kept safe and secure following strict privacy rules .
Your elected officials can help. The Office of Congresswoman Julia Brownley, for example, may assist with:
To find your representative, visit the United States House of Representatives website and enter your zip code .
If you have been detained for a prolonged period—generally over six months—or if you have statutory protections like parole or TPS, you may have grounds for a habeas petition. While hiring an attorney is best, some individuals successfully file pro se (representing themselves).
Your habeas petition should argue:
These legal victories matter for reasons beyond the individuals directly affected.
First, they establish precedent. Every successful habeas petition, every granted TRO, every preliminary injunction sends a message to ICE and DHS that they cannot operate with impunity. Courts are watching, and they will enforce constitutional and statutory limits.
Second, they build community power. As ImmDef notes, through culturally competent legal representation, community education, and coordinated regional support, “we make sure no one is left to navigate an immigration emergency alone. Our work strengthens community power, safeguards due process, and pushes back against a system designed to intimidate and isolate” .
Third, they save lives. Detention is not neutral—it is harmful. People detained in ICE facilities face overcrowding, unsafe conditions, and separation from families and legal support . Every person released is a person who can return to their community, their job, their children.
The recent habeas victories in California prove something essential: the law can be a tool of liberation, not just oppression. When immigrants and their advocates stand up and demand their rights, courts sometimes listen.
Yes, the situation is frightening. Yes, enforcement has escalated. Yes, the system is stacked against immigrants in many ways. But despair is not an option—and it is not justified by the facts.
In just the past few months, a TPS holder was ordered released despite ICE’s
As of September 30, 2025, Congress has yet to pass essential spending bills to keep…
As of 2025, significant new fees affect asylum seekers and those applying for related immigration…
USCIS’s new guidance on military naturalization is likely to make the process harder for some…
If U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) subjects you to secondary screening, detention, or demands to search your…
In the United States, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) does not have the authority to…
If you’re an international student on an F-1 visa and your SEVIS record was just…