Categories: SCOTUS WatchUSCIS

Supreme Court Greenlights ‘Public Charge’ Rule

In a narrow 5-4 decision along ideological lines, the Supreme Court has given the Trump administration the greenlight to enforce a rule that could make it harder for certain immigrants to gain green cards in the United States.

‘Likely to become a public charge’ is a ground of inadmissibility under the Immigration and Nationality Act, meaning that non-citizens seeking to be admitted to the United States also need to prove they they would not become reliant on public benefits. The government can use the designation to deny an immigrant a green card for permanent U.S. residency, and to determine which noncitizens can be removed or barred from the U.S.

In 2019, the Trump Administration created new regulations that expanded the pool of people who could be considered a likely ‘public charge’ in the United States. Before the rules could go into effect, federal courts in various states issued nationwide injunctions against the new rules.

Denials of green cards based on the public charge rule have increased under the Trump administration even without this policy in place.

Prior to the rule, only persons who had received SSI, TANF, state/local cash assistance and public assistance for a long-term care in an institution could be charged under the public charge grounds of inadmissibility. Now, the Trump Administration has added the following public benefits programs to the list:

  • Federal cash assistance programs
  • SNAP
  • Section 8 Housing Voucher Program
  • Section 8 Rental Assistance
  • Medicaid (except for emergency Medicaid, certain disability services related to education, and benefits received by foreign-born children of U.S. citizen parents who will be automatically eligible to become citizens)
  • Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy Program
  • Subsidized public housing

Further, past use of these public benefits can also be weighed against applicants.

As a matter of law and per USCIS instructions, the following classes of individuals are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, among others:
1. Applicants for asylum, refugee or adjustment of status based on asylum or refugee status;
3. Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners or adjustment of status based on VAWA;
4. Applicants for T (victim of human trafficking) nonimmigrant status;
5. Petitioners for U (crime victim) nonimmigrant status or adjustment of status based on U status; or
6. Applicants for Temporary Protected Status
7. Applicants filing for adjustment on the basis of Special Immigrant Juvenile Status.

When in doubt about whether the new rules apply to you, consult with an immigration attorney.

Prerna Lal

Immigration Attorney

Share
Published by
Prerna Lal

Recent Posts

Navigating CBP Secondary Inspection, Searches and Seizures

If U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) subjects you to secondary screening, detention, or demands to search your…

3 weeks ago

Is the U.S. Government Monitoring Your Pro-Palestine Posts?

In the United States, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) does not have the authority to…

4 weeks ago

SEVIS Termination? Here Is What You Can Do

If you’re an international student on an F-1 visa and your SEVIS record was just…

4 weeks ago

Trump Administration Ends CHNV and CBP One Program, Revoking Parole for Thousands of Migrants

The Trump administration has taken a major step in its immigration enforcement agenda by ending the…

4 weeks ago

Trump Administration Pauses Green Cards for Asylees and Refugees: What You Need to Know

The Trump administration has announced a temporary pause on green card applications for certain asylees and refugees,…

4 weeks ago

The Laken Riley Act Passes: What It Means for Immigration Enforcement and Public Safety

In a landmark decision, Congress passed the Laken Riley Act, which is expected to be…

3 months ago