Categories: DetentionSCOTUS Watch

Supreme Court to Decide Whether “When Released” Means Immediately Released from Criminal Custody

In Nielsen v. Preap, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, Kelly v. Preap, in which the question presented is, “Whether a criminal alien becomes exempt from mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. 1226(c) if, after the alien is released from criminal custody, the Department of Homeland Security does not take him into immigration custody immediately.” The statute in question provides that the Attorney General shall take certain non-citizens into custody “when the alien is released” from criminal custody.

As background, in Preap v. Johnson, 303 F.R.D. 566 (N.D. Cal. 2014), the district court held that INA § 236(c), the mandatory detention provision applicable to non-citizens who are convicted of enumerated criminal offenses, unambiguously requires mandatory detention without bond only for non-citizens detained immediately upon release from criminal custody. The Ninth Circuit affirmed this decision, creating a split among the Courts of Appeals: the Second, Third, Fourth, and Tenth Circuits, which do not require DHS to act immediately, versus the First and Ninth Circuits, which do.

Prerna Lal

Immigration Attorney

Share
Published by
Prerna Lal

Recent Posts

Reject California’s Proposition 39: Trump’s Fearmongering, Billionaire Money, and Your Right to Vote

An eligible citizen can submit a genuine ballot and still lose their vote because of…

3 weeks ago

Ninth Circuit: Due Process Still Applies to Immigrants Detained Inside the United States

The federal government has increasingly advanced an expansive theory of immigration detention: that once Congress…

2 months ago

Your Client Won Release From ICE Detention. Now How Do They Get Home?

An attorney’s guide to post-release transportation, shelter, and reunification resources at California’s ICE detention centers…

3 months ago

Deny, Deny, Deny: How the Trump Administration Is Reengineering Immigration Law One BIA Decision at a Time

It is only August, and the Board of Immigration Appeals has already spent 2026 producing…

3 months ago

BIA Overrules Matter of Arrabally: A Harsh New Advance Parole Rule, and What It Actually Means

On August 13, 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a major decision in Matter…

3 months ago

Contempt for Thee, Not for Me: EOIR’s Proposed Rule for Punishing Lawyers Who Say the Quiet Part Out Loud

There is something almost admirable about the Trump administration’s capacity to make parody obsolete. After…

3 months ago