Categories: Same-Sex Couples

Same-Sex Couples Using ART: Your Baby Is No Longer An Alien

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has finally published long-awaited guidance regarding children born using assisted reproductive technology (ART). For the purposes of immigration law, the “parent” of a child now includes both a genetic parent or gestational parent such that a gestational mother can petition for a child so long as she is the legal parent of the child. This tiny fix in the regulation has far-reaching immigrations.

Previous guidance on this matter was often contradictory. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not expressly require a genetic link for a parent-child relationship. However, up until recently, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) required genetic kinship for citizenship transmission to children. The citizenship of a child was determined based on the man who provided the sperm and the woman who provided the egg.

This led to ludicrous cases where a U.S. citizen carrying her foreign-born partner’s egg fertilized through an anonymous sperm donor had to adopt her own baby to transmit U.S. citizenship or where a child born through a surrogate could not assume U.S. citizenship. Faced with such unsatisfactory outcomes, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, held in Solis-Espinoza v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2005), that no genetic relationship is required for a foreign-born child to derive citizenship at birth from the U.S. citizen spouse of a biological parent.

Since that decision, conceiving children through ART has become even more prevalent. While married, different sex couples are most likely to use ART, this new guidance from USCIS predominantly affected same-sex couples who could not meet the prior genetic relationship requirement laid out in regulations. Oftentimes, same-sex couples with children born through ART were forced to live in exile abroad in order to stay together as one family unit because their children were not considered U.S. citizens.

We look forward to assisting LGBT families reunite with their loved ones in the U.S.

Prerna Lal

Immigration Attorney

Recent Posts

Reject California’s Proposition 39: Trump’s Fearmongering, Billionaire Money, and Your Right to Vote

An eligible citizen can submit a genuine ballot and still lose their vote because of…

4 days ago

Ninth Circuit: Due Process Still Applies to Immigrants Detained Inside the United States

The federal government has increasingly advanced an expansive theory of immigration detention: that once Congress…

4 weeks ago

Your Client Won Release From ICE Detention. Now How Do They Get Home?

An attorney’s guide to post-release transportation, shelter, and reunification resources at California’s ICE detention centers…

2 months ago

Deny, Deny, Deny: How the Trump Administration Is Reengineering Immigration Law One BIA Decision at a Time

It is only August, and the Board of Immigration Appeals has already spent 2026 producing…

2 months ago

BIA Overrules Matter of Arrabally: A Harsh New Advance Parole Rule, and What It Actually Means

On August 13, 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a major decision in Matter…

2 months ago

Contempt for Thee, Not for Me: EOIR’s Proposed Rule for Punishing Lawyers Who Say the Quiet Part Out Loud

There is something almost admirable about the Trump administration’s capacity to make parody obsolete. After…

2 months ago