Same-Sex Couples Using ART: Your Baby Is No Longer An Alien

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has finally published long-awaited guidance regarding children born using assisted reproductive technology (ART). For the purposes of immigration law, the “parent” of a child now includes both a genetic parent or gestational parent such that a gestational mother can petition for a child so long as she is the legal parent of the child. This tiny fix in the regulation has far-reaching immigrations.

Previous guidance on this matter was often contradictory. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not expressly require a genetic link for a parent-child relationship. However, up until recently, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) required genetic kinship for citizenship transmission to children. The citizenship of a child was determined based on the man who provided the sperm and the woman who provided the egg.

This led to ludicrous cases where a U.S. citizen carrying her foreign-born partner’s egg fertilized through an anonymous sperm donor had to adopt her own baby to transmit U.S. citizenship or where a child born through a surrogate could not assume U.S. citizenship. Faced with such unsatisfactory outcomes, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, held in Solis-Espinoza v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2005), that no genetic relationship is required for a foreign-born child to derive citizenship at birth from the U.S. citizen spouse of a biological parent.

Since that decision, conceiving children through ART has become even more prevalent. While married, different sex couples are most likely to use ART, this new guidance from USCIS predominantly affected same-sex couples who could not meet the prior genetic relationship requirement laid out in regulations. Oftentimes, same-sex couples with children born through ART were forced to live in exile abroad in order to stay together as one family unit because their children were not considered U.S. citizens.

We look forward to assisting LGBT families reunite with their loved ones in the U.S.

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

House GOP Suffers Setback as Impeachment of Mayorkas Fails

In a dramatic turn of events, the House of Representatives on Tuesday failed to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, falling short by a single vote in a major blow to House Republicans. The articles of impeachment, centered on accusations of mismanagement of the US-Mexico border, were ultimately defeated 214-216, with four Republicans joining all Democrats in opposition.


USCIS Fee Increases Take Effect April 1, 2024

Get ready for a change in the immigration landscape! On April 1, 2024, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will implement significant fee increases for a variety of immigration and naturalization benefits. This change, announced in January 2024, aims to help USCIS recover its operating costs more fully and support timely processing of new applications.


Broken Promises at the Border: How Biden Is Abandoning Migrants

When President Biden ran for office, he promised a break from the cruel and restrictive immigration policies of his predecessor, Donald Trump. Yet, three years into his term and with re-election looming, a stark reality has set in: the dream of a humane and just immigration system seems to be fading faster than a desert mirage. Recent developments paint a disturbing picture of an administration seemingly backpedaling on its once-bold commitments, leaving countless migrants stranded in a morass of broken promises and unfulfilled hopes. Humanitarian changes to our immigration system continue to languish, with no hope of passage.