The Much Anticipated H-4 EAD Unveiled

The Department of Homeland Security has finally announced that effective May 26, 2015, spouses of H-1B non-immigrants on H-4 visas can apply for employment eligibility. The news is welcome relief for thousands of spouses on H-4 visas who have been lawfully present in the U.S. but unable to work legally.

The rule change would allow H-4 spouses to apply for employment authorization if their H-1B spouse is a beneficiary of an approved I-140 immigrant petition or, if the H-1B spouse has been granted an extension of stay based upon the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 (AC21), beyond the six years initially authorized by the H-1B visa.

The final rule (RIN 1615-AB92) contains only minor, clarifying changes from a proposed rule released in May 2014 (8 WIR 317, 5/12/14). Those changes include clarification that evidence submitted with an I-765 application for an employment authorization document (EAD) must include proof that the applicant is currently in H-4 status and his or her spouse is currently in H-1B status.

The new rule will allow the spouses of many H-1B workers to obtain work authorization, build sustainable lives in the U.S., integrate and contribute to the economy. DHS estimates that about 179,600 individuals will be immediately eligible to work, removing hardships that have caused some H-1B holders to leave the U.S. An additional 55,000 eligible would be eligible from the next fiscal year.

The DHS also is allowing concurrent filing of the I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with an I-539 application to extend/change nonimmigrant status.

While this change is a welcome step in the right direction, it is exceedingly narrow and only provides work authorization to a limited number of H-4 visa holders. As part of future administrative relief, DHS should consider extending work authorization benefits to all H-4 visa holders, incident to status. This includes the children of H-1B workers, who often age out of eligibility for lawful permanent residence due to the significant employment-visa backlog, and are unable to benefit from programs such as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) due to their lawful status as of June 15, 2012.

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

The Laken Riley Act Passes: What It Means for Immigration Enforcement and Public Safety

In a landmark decision, Congress passed the Laken Riley Act, which is expected to be signed into law by President Trump. The bill is a controversial piece of legislation named in honor of the 22-year-old nursing student whose tragic death sparked national debates about immigration enforcement and public safety. The bill, which cleared its final hurdles this week, aims to tighten immigration laws and address concerns about crimes committed by undocumented individuals. Here’s what you need to know about the law and its potential impacts.

Read

Federal Judge Ends Keeping Families Together Program

A federal judge in Texas has struck down the Biden administration’s “Keeping Families Together” program, a policy that would have allowed undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens to remain in the country while adjusting status. Ultimately, despite the claims of the states who sued to stop this policy, it is the American public, including the hundreds of thousands of families impacted by this decision, who will bear the human and social costs of this decision.

Read